MCCARTHY ET AL.
v.
BLOEDEL DONOVAN LUMBER MILLS
MCCARTHY ET AL.
BLOEDEL DONOVAN LUMBER MILLS
282 U.S. 840
Supreme Court of the United States (1930)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. O'Melveny & Meyers, 969 F.2d 744 (9th Cir. 1992)…636, 639 (1978) (citations omitted). This rule applies even when, as here, a single individual owns nearly all of the corporation's stock. In re John Koke Co., 38 F. 2d 232, 233 (9th Cir.1930) cert. denied sub nom. A.R. Demory Invest. Co. v. Haese, 282 U.S. 840, 51 S.Ct. 21, 75 L.Ed. 746 (1930); Potts v. First City Bank, 7 Cal.App.3d 341, 345-46, 86 Cal.Rptr. 552, 555 (1970).5 We next inquire whether Sahni and Day's wrongdoing as corporate officers can appropriately be attributed to ADSB.6 "Generally the…
-
Des Moines Elevator & Grain Co. v. Underwriters' Grain Ass'n, 63 F.2d 103 (8th Cir. 1933)…” This permitted the joinder of the defendants in the one action, but it did not create joint liability. The question here involved was considered by this court in the ease of Stewart v. Nebraska Tire & Rubber Co., 39 F.(2d) 309 (certiorari denied 282 U. S. 840, 51 S. Ct. 21, 75 L. Ed. 746). That was a suit brought in a state court of Iowa against the maker and indorser of a promissory note. The maker of the note, who was a citizen of Nebraska, removed the ease on the ground of diversity of citizenship a…