INGRAM

v.

LEWIS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Werthan Bag Corp. v. Agnew, 202 F.2d 119 (6th Cir. 1953)
  …ury’s verdict on the ground of ex-cessiveness where the damages are unliquidated and there is no fixed measure of mathematical certainty. Powers v. Wilson, 2 Cir., 110 F. 2d 960; United States Can Co. v. Ryan, 8 Cir., 39 F. 2d 445, certiorari denied 282 U.S. 842, 51 S.Ct. 23, .75 L.Ed. 748. This is particularly significant with respect to damages in tort actions for personal injuries.” In Jennings v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co., D.C.Minn., 43 F. 2d 397, Judge Sanborn stated that, on the motion for a new t…
• Armit v. Loveland, 115 F.2d 308 (3d Cir. 1940)
  …ury’s verdict on the ground of excessiveness where the damages are unliquidated and there is no fixed measure of mathematical certainty. Powers v. Wilson, 2 Cir., 110 F. 2d 960; United States Can Co. v. Ryan, 8 Cir., 39 F. 2d 445, certiorari denied, 282 U.S. 842, 51 S.Ct. 23, 75 L.Ed. 748. This is particularly significant with respect to damages in tort actions for personal injuries. There is no merit in the appellants’ remaining complaint respecting alleged misstatements in thé trial court’s charge to the…
• Okla. Natural Gas Co. v. McKEE, 121 F.2d 583 (10th Cir. 1941)
  …f the motion was that the damages awarded by the jury were excessive or inadequate. Armit v. Loveland et al., 3 Cir., 115 F. 2d 308, 314; Powers v. Wilson, 2 Cir., 110 F. 2d 960; United States Can Co. v. Ryan, 8 Cir., 39 F. 2d 445, certiorari denied 282 U.S. 842, 51 S.Ct. 23, 75 L.Ed. 748; Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co. et al., 287 U.S. 474, 53 S.Ct. 252, 77 L.Ed. 439. In the absence of clear evidence in the record that the verdict was the result of passion and prejudice, this court is without…