SALISBURY TRANSPORTATION CO.

v.

STARK ELECTRIC R. CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Def. Supplies Corp. v. United States Lines Co., 148 F.2d 311 (2d Cir. 1945)
  …o. v. United States, 6 Cir., 31 F. 2d 826; United States v. Skinner & Eddy Corporation, 9 Cir., 35 F. 2d 889, certiorari denied 281 U.S. 770, 50 S.Ct. 248, 74 L.Ed. 1176; United States v. Czarnikow-Rionda Co., 2 Cir., 40 F. 2d 214, certiorari denied 282 U.S. 844, 51 S.Ct. 24, 75 L.Ed. 749; Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. Krauss, D.C., 12 F.Supp. 44; Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. Graydon, D.C., 16 F.Supp. 765; United States v. Freeman, D.C., 21 F.Supp. 597; United States v. Arthur, D.C., 23 F.S…
• Montauk OIL Transp. Corp. v. Sonat Marine, Inc., 871 F.2d 1169 (2d Cir. 1989)
  …l bear the loss.” Id. at 265. However, time-honored maritime doctrines related to strike delays generally place the burden on the charterer, not the owner. See, e.g., United States v. Czarnikow-Rionda Co., 40 F. 2d 214, 216 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 282 U.S. 844, 51 S.Ct. 24, 75 L.Ed. 749 (1930); Yone Suzuki v. Central Argentine Ry., 27 F. 2d 795, 804 (2d Cir.1928), cert. denied, 278 U.S. 652, 49 S.Ct. 178, 73 L.Ed. 563 (1929); New York & Cuba Mail S.S. Co. v. Lamborn, 8 F. 2d 382, 385 (S.D.N.Y.1925), modif…
• United States v. New Amsterdam Cas. Co. (S.D.N.Y. 1932)
  …n (D. C.) 5 F.(2d) 708; same case in (D. C.) 28 F.(2d) 373, affirmed in (C. C. A.) 35 F.(2d) 889, certiorari denied in 281 U. S. 770, 50 S. Ct. 248, 74 L. Ed. 1176; United States v. Czarnikow-Rionda Co. (C. C. A.) 40 F.(2d) 214, certiorari denied in 282 U. S. 844, 51 S. Ct. 24, 75 L. Ed. 749. The assignment is invoked only to overcome the technical rule relating to the seal. Moreover, the paragraph setting forth the breaches of contract by the Shipbuilding Company does allege that it failed to pay “to the pl…