ARONSTEIN

v.

NEW YORK CENTRAL R. CO.

Citator

Cited By

• McCARTY v. Hollis, 120 F.2d 540 (10th Cir. 1941)
  …d States, 254 U.S. 570, 41 S.Ct. 204, 65 L.Ed. 410; Cramer v. United States, 261 U.S. 219, 43 S.Ct. 342, 67 L.Ed. 622; United States v. Minnesota, 270 U.S. 181, 46 S.Ct. 298, 70 L.Ed. 539; Mars v. Mc-Dougal, 10 Cir., 40 F. 2d 247, certiorari denied, 282 U.S. 850, 51 S.Ct. 28, 75 L.Ed. 753; Tiger v. Twin-State Oil Co., 10 Cir., 48 F. 2d 509. The right to maintain such suits is the necessary complement to the obligations of guardianship which the United States bears toward its wards. Heckman v. United States,…
• Pueblo de Taos v. Archuleta, 64 F.2d 807 (10th Cir. 1933)
  …“with prejudice” cannot change the facts. A dismissal with prejudice implies a decision on the merits, either after an adjudication of right or pursuant to an agreement of the parties. Mars v. McDougal (C. C. A. 10) 40 F.(2d) 247, certiorari denied 282 U. S. 850, 51 S. Ct. 28, 75 L. Ed. 753. There could be no such adjudication between the parties in this ease, for the defendants, not being in court, could not be concluded by such adjudication. There is no contention that the dismissal was pursuant to a sett…
• T. W. Phillips, Jr., Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 63 F.2d 101 (3d Cir. 1933)
  …e present ease is aided by the discussions and decisions in Newman, Saunders & Co. v. United States (Ct. Cl.) 36 F.(2d) 1009; Id., 281 U. S. 760, 50 S. Ct. 460, 74 L. Ed. 1169; and Osburn California Corporation v. Welch (C. C. A.) 39 F.(2d) 41; Id., 282 U. S. 850, 51 S. Ct. 28, 75 L. Ed. 753, directly holding the provision constitutional. On facts similar to these in the instant case, the decision in the Newman, Saunders & Co. Case, holding that the taxation was not of capital and that the proper basis for…