MARYLAND CASUALTY CO.
v.
MASSEY
MARYLAND CASUALTY CO.
MASSEY
282 U.S. 853
Supreme Court of the United States (1930)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sterneck v. Equitable Life Ins. Co. OF Iowa, 237 F.2d 626 (8th Cir. 1956)…nt page as a convertible term policy expiring at age 65. Plaintiff contends that such designations are not a part of the insurance contract and cites Maryland Casualty Co. v. Massey, 6 Cir., 1930, 38 F. 2d 724, 725, 71 A.L.R. 1428, certiorari denied 282 U.S. 853, 51 S.Ct. 30, 75 L.Ed. 756, together with other cases not from the State of Missouri. Suffice it to say that the rule announced in Maryland Casualty Co. v. Massey, supra, is not the law of Missouri. The Supreme Court of Missouri, in Doty v. American…
-
Fifty Assocs. v. The Prudential Ins. Co. OF Am., 450 F.2d 1007 (9th Cir. 1971)…as echoed this view by acknowledging that the question of land value “is generally a matter of opinion only.” Sacramento Suburban [*1011] Fruit Lands Co. v. Melin, 36 F. 2d 907, 910 (9th Cir. 1929), cert denied Suburban Fruit Lands Co. v. Lindquist, 282 U.S. 853, 51 S.Ct. 31, 75 L.Ed. 756 (1930). Indeed, it is not without significance to this controversy that the Supreme Court of Arizona has recently ruled that an assurance that certain real property “was worth $7,500.00 per acre” was an expression of opini…
-
Mass. Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Mayo, 81 F.2d 661 (9th Cir. 1936)…. American Surety Co. (C.C.A.) 69 F.(2d) 147; National City Bank v. National Sec. Co. (C.C.A.) 58 F.(2d) 7; Travelers’ Ins. Co. v. Nax (C.C.A.) 142 F. 653; Maryland Cas. Co. v. Massey (C.C.A.) 38 F.(2d) 724, 71 A.L.R. 1428, certiorari de [*666] nied 282 U.S. 853, 51 S.Ct. 30, 75 L.Ed. 756; Fountain & Herrington v. Mut. L. Ins. Co. (C.C.A.) 55 F.(2d) 120; Becker v. Interstate Business Men’s Acc. Ass’n (C.C.A.) 265 F. 508. We feel it unnecessary to analyze and distinguish these various cases. To do so would…