CLINCHFIELD RAILROAD CO.
v.
DUNN, ADMINISTRATRIX

U.S. | 1930-10-13
No. 283
282 U.S. 860 Supreme Court of the United States (1930) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …rk Central R. Co. v. Platt & Brahm Coal Co., 236 Ill.App. 150. Pere Marquette R. Co. v. American Coal & Supply Co., 239 Ill.App. 139, 145, 146, 148; Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Southern C., C. & M. Co., 254 Ill.App. 238, 246, certiorari denied 282 U.S. 860, 51 S.Ct. 34, 75 L.Ed. 761. Pittsburgh, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Fink, 250 U.S. 577, 40 S.Ct. 27, 63 L.Ed. 1151; L. & N. R. Co. v. Central Iron Co., 265 U.S. 59, 44 S.Ct. 441, 68 L.Ed. 900; New York Cent. & H. R. R. Co. v. York & Whitney Co., 256…
  • …Ed. 355; Weldon v. United States, 1 Cir., 65 F. 2d 748. Similarly the substitution of the same defendant in a new capacity does not change the nature of the action, Clinchfield Ry. Co. v. Dunn, 6 Cir., 40 F. 2d 586, 74 A.L.R. 1276, certiorari denied 282 U.S. 860, 51 S.Ct. 34, 75 L.Ed. 761 — and amended recitals, even such as add circumstances vital to recovery, are likewise without that effect. New York Central & Hudson River R. Co. v. Kinney, 260 U.S. 340, 43 S.Ct. 122, 67 L.Ed. 294; Manhattan Oil Co. v. M…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw