PIERCE ET AL.

v.

ALBION IDAHO LAND CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Hageny v. The United States, 570 F.2d 924 (Ct. Cl. 1978)
  …ndeed, even a hint of fraud will not support a finding of fraud, see Eastern School v. United States, supra, 381 F. 2d at 434, 180 Ct.Cl. at 698, nor will the existence of fraud be presumed. DeLuca v. United States, 69 Ct.Cl. 262, 264, cert. denied, 282 U.S. 862, 51 S.Ct. 36, 75 L.Ed. 763 (1930). . On December 13, 1970, two of plaintiffs skidder machines were burned in the sale area not far from where the wet paint was discovered on December 4, 1970. Plaintiff pointed to this occurrence as an example of th…
• Am. Potato Dryers, Inc. v. Peters, 184 F.2d 165 (4th Cir. 1950)
  …indings 34, 35 and 36. A -patent may not, of -course,- be granted for a process when the process has been disclosed by prior patents -covering machines to practice the process. MacDougald Const. Co. v. Finley, 5 Cir., 38 F. 2d 809, certiorari denied 282 U.S. 862, 51 S.Ct. 36, 75 L.Ed 763; Girdler Corp. v. Abbotts Dairies, D. C., 24 F.Supp. 551, affirmed 3 Cir., 106 F. 2d 998. Since the patent is manifestly1 void on account of the prior -uses-established by the evidence, it is not necessary that we consider…