HUDSON RIVER NAVIGATION CO.

v.

THE CEDARHURST

Citator

Cited By

• Aguilar v. Standard Oil Co. of N.J., 318 U.S. 724 (U.S. 1943)
  …S. Co., 33 F. Supp. 356 (D. C.). The Quaker City, 1 F. Supp. 840 (D. C.). Cf. text and note 15 infra. Compare Yukes v. Globe S. S. Corp., 107 F. 2d 888 (C. C. A.); but cf. States S. S. Co. v. Berglann, 41 F. 2d 456 (C. C. A.), certiorari denied, 282 U. S. 868; Holm v. Cities Service Transportation Co., 60 F. 2d 721 (C. C. A.). The recent tendency to confine the scope of the obligation to those shipboard injuries which are caused by the requirements of the seaman’s duties (Meyer v. Dollar S. S. Lines, 49…
• Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Saltonstall, 124 F.2d 110 (1st Cir. 1941)
  …the Act of 1926, has any application to the state of facts here presented. See Nicollet Associates, Inc. v. Commissioner, 1938, 37 B.T.A. 350, 356, 357. In Levi Strauss Realty Co. v. United States, 9 Cir., 1930, 41 F. 2d 55, certiorari denied, 1930, 282 U.S. 868, 51 S.Ct. 75, 75 L.Ed. 767, two affiliated corporations (A and B) filed separate returns for both 1921 and 1922. They should have filed a consolidated return for 1921;' for 1922 such return was optional. Corporation A suffered a loss in 1921 which i…