CLARKE ET AL.
v.
BOYSEN ET AL.; POGSON, TRUSTEE, ET AL., V. BIG HORN POWER CO. ET AL.; AND CLARKE ET AL. V. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY R. CO.
CLARKE ET AL.
BOYSEN ET AL.; POGSON, TRUSTEE, ET AL., V. BIG HORN POWER CO. ET AL.; AND CLARKE ET AL. V. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY R. CO.
282 U.S. 869
Supreme Court of the United States (1930)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Puget Sound Nav. Co. v. Nelson, 59 F.2d 697 (9th Cir. 1932)…l from a judgment in an action at law, tried to a jury, in which the appellee sought to recover damages for loss of property and alleged personal injury. The case has previously boon before this court on appeal. 41 F.(2d) 356, 357, certiorari denied 282 U. S. 869, 51 S. Ct. 76, 75 L. Ed. 768. At about 5 p. m., December 5, 1927, the steam ferry Olympic, owned and operated by the appellant, collided with the small power fishboat, Magna, owned and operated by the appellee. The collision occurred in Puget Sound…
-
Yetta Freeman v. Heiman, 426 F.2d 1050 (10th Cir. 1970)…ite jurisdiction to enter any order affecting Mrs. Heiman’s property. 33 C.J.S. Executions § 378(c); Hitchman Coal & Coke Co. v. Mitchell, 245 U.S. 229, 38 S.Ct. 65, 62 L.Ed. 260 (1917); Clarke v. Boysen, 39 F. 2d 800 (10th Cir. 1930), cert. denied, 282 U.S. 869, 51 S.Ct. 75, 75 L.Ed. 768 (1930); Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company v. Myers, 290 F.Supp. 405 (E.D.Pa.1968); Squeez-APurse Corporation v. Stiller, 31 F.R.D. 261 (S.D.N.Y.1962). We do not infer that the property in the name of Mrs. Heiman could not…
-
City of Norton v. Lowden, 84 F.2d 663 (10th Cir. 1936)…. O. Railway Co., 67 Kan. 569, 70 P. 939, 73 P. 899, as has the Court of Appeals of New York in an opinion by Mr. Justice Cardozo, In re Newport Ave., 218 N.Y. 274, 112 N.E. 911, and our own court, Clarke v. Boysen, 39 F.(2d) 800, certiorari denied 282 U.S. 869, 51 S.Ct. 75, 75 L.Ed. 768. For instances where it has been held that the second use did not materially interfere with the first, see Pacific P. Telegraph Cable Co. v. Oregon & C. R. Co. (C.C.) 163 F. 967, and Oregon Short Line R. Co. v. Postal Te…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence