GOLDSCHLAG
v.
DEEGAN, COMMISSIONER
GOLDSCHLAG
DEEGAN, COMMISSIONER
282 U.S. 876
Supreme Court of the United States (1930)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States ex rel. Anthony Scoleri v. Banmiller, 310 F.2d 720 (3d Cir. 1962)…he Matter of the Application of Ci-cenia for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, 240 F. 2d 844 (3 Cir. 1957). . To the same effect, Massey v. United States, 281 F. 293, 296-298 (8 Cir. 1922); Smith v. United States, 41 F. 2d 215, 217 (9 Cir. 1930), cert. den. 282 U.S. 876, 51 S.Ct. 80, 75 L.Ed. 773. . In Virginia and New York as early as 1796 and in Massachusetts since 1804. . A long line of cases in the State courts involving state multiple and habitual offender laws have approved the admissibility of evidence of…
-
Asbestos Corp. Ltd. v. Compagnie de Navigation Frais-Sinet ET Cyprien Fabre, 480 F.2d 669 (2d Cir. 1973)…ted in or controlled from that room. Consequently, it is negligence to fail to provide an emergency pump or fire extinguisher system located or controlled from outside the engine room. Christopher v. Grueby, 40 F. 2d 8, 11-12 (1 Cir.), cert. denied, 282 U.S. 876 (1930). Appellants failed to maintain equipment which could be utilized in the event of a fire in the engine room notwithstanding that adequate equipment could have been provided with little effort and expense. Appellants contend that the vessel’s…
-
N.Y. & Cuba Mail S. S. Co. v. Cont'l Ins. Co. of City of N.Y., 117 F.2d 404 (2d Cir. 1941)…ded in 1915. The Republic, 2 Cir., 61 F. 109, 113; In re P. Sanford Ross, Inc., 2 Cir., 204 F. 248; The Maria, 4 Cir., 91 F. 2d 819; In re Great Lakes Transit Corp., 6 Cir., 81 F. 2d 441; Christopher v. Grueby, 1 Cir., 40 F. 2d 8, certiorari denied, 282 U.S. 876, 51 S.Ct. 80, 75 L.Ed. 774; The Miami, D.C.E.D.N.Y., 43 F. 2d 562; cf. In re Jacobson, D.C.S.D.Tex., 52 F. 2d 179. [*410] The words of the policy here go somewhat beyond the Limitation Statute, in that they expressly except liability for loss which…