IOWA STATE INS. CO.
v.
GODWIN ET AL.
IOWA STATE INS. CO.
GODWIN ET AL.
282 U.S. 880
Supreme Court of the United States (1930)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Read, 658 F.2d 1225 (7th Cir. 1981)…er cites Hyde and Deacon v. United States, 124 F. 2d 352, 358 (1st Cir. 1941). Deacon endorsed an “if you find” instruction without reference to the burden of proof, citing Hyde; Stephens v. United States, 41 F. 2d 440, 448 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 282 U.S. 880, 51 S.Ct. 83, 75 L.Ed. 777 (1930); and Mansfield v. United States, 76 F. 2d 224, 229-30 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 296 U.S. 601, 56 S.Ct. 117, 80 L.Ed. 425 (1935). Stephens cited Hyde in holding that the defendant failed to “disavow or otherwise do w…
-
United States v. Schaefer, 299 F.2d 625 (7th Cir. 1962)…d 96 (1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 943, 72 S.Ct. 555, 96 L.Ed. 701. It is not necessary to show that the entire course of the transaction was a fraud. In Stephens v. United States, 9 Cir., 41 F. 2d 440 (1930), cert. denied, Spicer v. United States, 282 U.S. 880, 51 S.Ct. 83, 75 L.Ed. 777, certain aspects of the defendants’ business were perfectly legal, and the defendants claimed that the mailings charged were in furtherance of the lawful aspects of their business. The court stated: “In respect of the que…
-
United States v. Mortimer, 118 F.2d 266 (2d Cir. 1941)…ence is admissible to prove their contents, as it would be if they were'outside the jurisdiction of the court or lost. Burton v. Driggs, 20 Wall. 125, 87 U.S. 125, 136, 22 L.Ed. 299; Stephens v. United States, 9 Cir., 41 F. 2d 440, certiorari denied 282 U.S. 880, 51 S.Ct. 84, 75 L.Ed. 777; see Galbreath v. United States, 6 Cir., 257 F. 648, 658; 4 Wigmore on Evidence, 3d Ed. 1940, §§ 1218, 1230. But appellant argues most strenuously that all of Karcher’s aides should have been called. That this is a purely…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence