COCA COLA CO.
v.
CARLISLE BOTTLING WORKS
COCA COLA CO.
CARLISLE BOTTLING WORKS
282 U.S. 882
Supreme Court of the United States (1930)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Harold F. Ritchie, Inc. v. Chesebrough-Pond's, Inc., 281 F.2d 755 (2d Cir. 1960)…ill present unusual questions of fair apportionment of award! I would affirm. . For other cases applying this principle, see Coca-Cola Co. v. Carlisle Bottling Works, D.C.E.D.Ky., 43 F. 2d 101, 114, affirmed 6 Cir., 43 F. 2d 119, certiorari denied 282 U.S. 882, 51 S.Ct. 86, 75 L.Ed. 778; Glenmore Distilleries Co. v. National Distillers Products Corp., 4 Cir., 101 F. 2d 479, certiorari denied 307 U.S. 632, 59 S.Ct. 835, 83 L.Ed. 1515; Pennzoil Co. v. Crown Central Petroleum Corp., D.C.Md., 50 F.Supp. 891,…
-
Sammet v. Mayer. In re Wyser, 108 F.2d 337 (2d Cir. 1939)…ilton in 26 Va.L.Rev. 168. The applicability of the statute to stocks and bonds was assumed in New York Trust Co. v. Island Oil & Transport Co., 2 Cir., 33 F. 2d 104, 79 A.L.R. 1007; and cf. Hams v. Marshall, 2 Cir., 43 F. 2d 703, certiorari denied 282 U.S. 882, 51 S.Ct. 85, 75 L.Ed. 778. Discussed in 39 Col.L.Rev. 485 — 196. If, as seems doubtful, the Uniform Trust Receipts Law, N.Y.Laws 1934, c. 574, Personal Property Law (Consol. Laws, c. 41) §§ 50-581, applies, the result is unchanged. For by that ac…