EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS STREET RY. CO.

v.

TRANSMARINE CORPORATION ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Natasha, Inc. v. Evita Marine Charters, Inc., 763 F.2d 468 (1st Cir. 1985)
  …s that admiralty does have jurisdiction if the charter portion of the sale contract is readily ‘separable’ from the rest of the contract. See Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co. v. Transmarine Corp., 42 F. 2d 58, 63-64 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 282 U.S. 883, 51 S.Ct. 86, 75 L.Ed. 779 (1930); G. Gilmore & C. Black, The Law of Admiralty § 1-10, at 28-29 & n. 95 (2d ed. 1975). The charter portion of the sale contract before us is readily separable. Hence, admiralty jurisdiction is proper. In fact, the rec…
• Markert v. Swift & Co., Inc., 173 F.2d 517 (2d Cir. 1949)
  …that appeal in view of the clear validity of the second appeal to raise the issues of substance. In attacking the second order denying leave to amend as not appealable, defendants rely upon Kulesza v. Blair, 7 Cir., 41 F. 2d 439, certiorari denied 282 U.S. 883, 51 S.Ct. 86, 75 L.Ed. 779. The implications of that decision, whatever its soundness under former practice, are certainly very limited at best under the specific provisions of the rules, particularly as now amended. Technically the judgment of dis…
• C. H. Mead Coal Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 106 F.2d 388 (4th Cir. 1939)
  …. Reversed. Buttolph v. Commissioner, 7 Cir., 29 F. 2d 695; Alameda Inv. Co. et al. v. McLaughlin, 9 Cir., 33 F. 2d 120; Rose v. Grant et al, 5 Cir., 39 F. 2d 340; Lucas v. St. Louis National Baseball Club, 8 Cir., 42 F. 2d 984; certiorari denied, 282 U.S. 883, 51 S.Ct. 87, 75 L.Ed. 779; Duke Power Co. v. Commissioner, 4 Cir., 44 F. 2d 543; Radiant Glass Company v. Burnet, 60 App.D.C. 351, 54 F. 2d 718; Champlin v. Commissioner, 10 Cir., 78 F. 2d 905.…