HILL ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Achtner, 144 F.2d 49 (2d Cir. 1944)
  …L.Ed. 861, and cases cited therein; United States v. Goldsmith, 2 Cir., 108 F. 2d 917, 920, certiorari denied Goldsmith v. United States, 309 U.S. 678, 60 S.Ct. 715, 84 L.Ed. 1022; Hill v. United States, 4 Cir., 42 F. 2d 812, 814, certiorari denied 282 U.S. 884, 51 S.Ct. 87, 75 L.Ed. 780; Hopper v. United States, 9 Cir., 142 F. 2d 181, 184, 185. Hence an indictment which charges a statutory crime by following substantially the language of the statute is amply sufficient, provided that its. generality neit…
• Superior Engraving Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 183 F.2d 783 (7th Cir. 1950)
  …tuted hearsay is, we think, fortified by Buckeye Powder Co. v. DuPont Powder Co., 248 U.S. 55, 39 S.Ct. 38, 63 L.Ed. 123; Bracken et al. v. Cato et al., 5 Cir., 54 F. 2d 457; Globe Indemnity Co. v. McAvoy Co., 7 Cir., 41 F. 2d 122, certiorari denied 282 U.S. 884, 51 S.Ct. 87, 75 L.Ed. 780. A labor union is an association constituting an entity suable in the federal courts. United Mine Workers of America et al., v. Coronado Coal Company et al., 259 U.S. 344, at page 381, 42 S.Ct. 570, 66 L.Ed. 975, 27 A.L.R.…
• United States v. Kushner, 135 F.2d 668 (2d Cir. 1943)
  …ations of the particularly cited statutes, in substantially the statutory language. Ordinarily an indictment in this form is sufficient. United States v. White, C.C.S.D.N.Y., 171 F. 775; Hill v. United States, 4 Cir., 42 F. 2d 812, certiorari denied 282 U.S. 884, 51 S.Ct. 87, 75 L.Ed. 706.5 It nowhere appears that he was prejudiced by the generality of the indictment in preparing his defense; indeed, his motion for a bill of particulars showed his understanding of the charge as a failure to declare and to i…