BRADY
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
BRADY
UNITED STATES ET AL.
283 U.S. 804
Supreme Court of the United States (1931)
Caution
Cited by 20 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The decree of dismissal by the specially constituted District Court is affirmed. Standard Oil Company (Indiana) v. United States, ante, p. 235; United States v. Louisville & Nashville R. Co., 235 U. S. 314, 320; Interstate Commerce Comm. v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. Co., 220 U. S. 235, 251; Interstate Commerce Comm. v. Illinois Central R. Co., 215 U. S. 452, 470; Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. United States ex rel. Pitcairn Coal Co., 215 U. S. 481, 494.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n, 337 U.S. 426 (U.S. 1949)…iew orders of the Commission denying reparations. Twice the decisions followed full argument: Standard Oil Co. v. United States, 283 U. S. 235, in which the bar of the Interstate Commerce Act to such review was expounded, and Brady v. United States, 283 U. S. 804, which relied on the Standard Oil case decided only a few weeks before. Twice thereafter the dismissal by district courts, for want of jurisdiction, of attempts to review such reparation orders was summarily affirmed without argument, so definitivel…1 / 3
-
Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. v. Brady, 288 U.S. 448 (U.S. 1933)…v. Southern Pacific Co., 283 U. S. 654, 661 Section 16 (2) does not permit suit in the absence of an award, and if the Commission denies him relief, a claimant is remediless. Standard Oil Co. v. United States, 283 U. S. 235. Brady v. United States, 283 U. S. 804. Bartlesville Zinc Co. v. Mellon, 56 F. (2d) 154. No suit is permitted if the carrier pays the award. Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Ohio Valley Tie Co., 242 U. S. 288. Cf. Penna. R. Co. v. Clark Coal Co., 238 U. S. 456. Plaintiff may not adopt the a…1 / 2
-
Wash. Terminal Co. v. Boswell, 124 F.2d 235 (D.C. Cir. 1941)…he Interstate Commerce and Packers and Stockyards Act is exclusive in the sense in which that term is being used in the instant case. In Brady v. Interstate Commerce Commission, D.C.N.D.W.Va.1930, 43 F. 2d 847, affirmed Brady v. United States, 1931, 283 U.S. 804, 51 S.Ct. 559, 75 L.Ed. 1424, a shipper attempted to obtain an order setting aside and correcting findings made by the Commission in a reparations suit and requiring the Commission to make a supplemental order on the basis of the corrected findings.…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Interstate Commerce Comm'n v. Ill. Cent. R.R. Co., 215 U.S. 452 (U.S. 1910)
- Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. v. United States Ex rel. Pitcairn Coal Co., 215 U.S. 481 (U.S. 1910)
- Interstate Commerce Comm'n v. Delaware, 220 U.S. 235 (U.S. 1911)
- United States v. Louisville & Nashville R.R. Co., 235 U.S. 314 (U.S. 1914)