LEACH
v.
CALIFORNIA
LEACH
CALIFORNIA
283 U.S. 808
Supreme Court of the United States (1931)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The appeal herein is dismissed. Stratton v. Stratton, 239 U. S. 55; Andrews v. Virginian Ry. Co., 248 U. S. 272, 275; Matthews v. Huwe, 269 U. S. 262, 265, 266; American Railway Express Co. v. Levee, 263 U. S. 19, 20.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
ST. Joseph Stock Yards Co. v. United States, 298 U.S. 38 (U.S. 1936)…to the Commission, at a cost, including a new appraisal and inventory, of more than $1,200,000. Hearings are now in progress. [*90] For the history of the investigation and litigation, see in this Court: 269 U. S. 531; 282 U. S. 133; 283 U. S. 794; 283 U. S. 808; 292 U. S. 151; in the lower court: 39 F. (2d) 157; 38 F. (2d) 77; 3 F. Supp. 595; in the Commission: 7 Opinions and Orders of Ill. P. U. Comm. 1920, 888; 8 id. 1921, 372; 3 Opinions and Orders of Ill. Commerce Comm. 1924, 75-99; 6th Administrative…
-
Ill. Bell Tel. Co. v. Slattery, 102 F.2d 58 (7th Cir. 1939)…ned, * * After various proceedings in which the case has on four occasions been in the Supreme Court of the United States (Smith v. Illinois Bell Tel. Co., 269 U.S. 531, 46 S.Ct. 22, 70 L.Ed. 397; Id., 282 U. S. 133, 51 S.Ct. 65, 75 L.Ed. 255; Id., 283 U.S. 808, 51 S.Ct. 646, 75 L.Ed. 1427; Ex parte Smith, 283 U.S. 794, 51 S.Ct. 482, 75 L.Ed. 1419), a decree of permanent injunction was entered on June 28, 1933, which, upon appeal, the Supreme Court in Lindheimer et al. v. Illinois Bell Telephone Company, 2…
-
Ill. Bell Tel. Co. v. Slattery, 98 F.2d 930 (7th Cir. 1938)…occasions been in the Supreme Court of the United States (Smith v. Illinois Bell Tel. Co., 269 U.S. 531, 46 S.Ct. 22, 70 L.Ed. 397; affirming interlocutory injunction; 282 U.S. 133, 51 S.Ct. 65, 75 L.Ed. 255, remanding final decree for new findings; 283 U.S. 808, 51 S.Ct. 646, 75 L.Ed. 1427, dismissing appeal of Commission for an order dissolving the interlocutory injunction; and Ex parte Smith, 283 U.S. 794, 51 S.Ct. 482, 75 L.Ed. 1419, denying leave to file motion for mandamus to lower court to dissolve i…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Am. Ry. Express Co. v. Levee, 263 U.S. 19 (U.S. 1923)
- Stratton v. Stratton, 239 U.S. 55 (U.S. 1915)
- Marianna Matthews v. Huwe, 269 U.S. 262 (U.S. 1925)
- Andrews v. Virginian Ry. Co., 248 U.S. 272 (U.S. 1919)