CLYNE

v.

OHIO

U.S. | 1931-06-01

No. 839

283 U.S. 810 Supreme Court of the United States (1931) Positive Treatment

Cited by 2 cases

Per_curiam

Per Curiam:

The appeal [*811] herein is dismissed. Farson, Son & Co. v. Bird, 248 U. S. 268.

Mr. Henry A. Williams for appellant.

Mr. Ray T. Miller for appellee.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Spielman Motor Sales Co., Inc. v. Dodge, 295 U.S. 89 (U.S. 1935)

…§ 266 of the Judicial Code has no application and we are without jurisdiction of this direct appeal from the District Court. Ex parte Collins, 277 U. S. 565, 568; Ex parte Public National Bank, 278 U. S. 101, 104; School District No. 7 v. Hunnicut, 283 U. S. 810. See, also, Oklahoma Gas Co. v. Packing Co., 292 U. S. 386, 390. The office of district attorney in the State of New York was created in 1801. In each of the districts as then established, which included several counties, he was charged with duties…
Wall v. McNee, 296 U.S. 547 (U.S. 1935)

…elow, are not state officers within the meaning of § 266 of the Judicial Code (Spielman Motor Co. v. Dodge, 295 U. S. 89, 92; Ex parte Collins, 277 U. S. 565, 568; Ex parte Public National Bank, 278 U. S. 101, 104; School District No. 7 v. Hunnicut, 283 U. S. 810; Ex parte Everglades Drainage District, 293 U. S. 521; Everglades Drainage Dist. v. Florida Ranch & Dairy Corp., 74 F. (2d) 914, 915, 916; Rorick v. Everglades Drainage, 27 F. (2d) 377, 380, 381), the decree herein is reversed and the cause remanded…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw