CROWELL, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,

v.

BENSON; AND CROWELL, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, ET AL. V. SAME

Citator

Cited By

• Crowell v. Benson, 285 U.S. 22 (U.S. 1932)
  …ded that Knudsen was not in the employ of the petitioner and restrained the enforcement of the award. 33 F. (2d) 137; 38 F. (2d) 306. The decree was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals, 45 F. (2d) 66, and this Court granted writs of certiorari. 283 U. S. 814. The question of the validity of the Act may be considered in relation to (1) its provisions defining substantive rights, and (2) its procedural requirements. First. The Act has two limitations that are fundamental. It deals exclusively with compe…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Tex. Emp'rs' Ins. Ass'n v. Sheppeard (S.D. Tex. 1932)
  …KENNERLY, District Judge. This is a proceeding in admiralty [Crowell v. Benson, 283 U. S. 814, 51 S. Ct. 353, 75 L. Ed. 1430; Id., 285 U. S. 22, 52 S. Ct. 285, 76 L. Ed. 369; Id. (D. C.) 33 F. (2d) 137; Id. (D. C.) 38 F.(2d) 306; Id. (C. C. A.) 45 F.(2d) 66] brought by the Texas Employers’ Insurance Association, libelant, to set aside an awa…