UNITED STATES

v.

RACHMIL

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Beery, 678 F.2d 856 (10th Cir. 1982)
  …sed has knowledge that a receiver or trustee has been appointed,7 see United States v. Yasser, 114 F. 2d 558, 560 (3d Cir.); Reiner v. United States, 92 F. 2d 823, 825 (9th Cir.); Rachmil v. United States, 43 F. 2d 878, 880 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 283 U.S. 819, 51 S.Ct. 344, 75 L.Ed. 1434; United States v. Grant, 1 F. 2d 723, 725 (E.D.Mich.); but see Douchan v. United States, 136 F. 2d 144, 146-147 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 319 U.S. 773, 63 S.Ct. 1439, 87 L.Ed. 1721, there is sufficient evidence to show t…
• United States v. Yasser, 114 F.2d 558 (3d Cir. 1940)
  …fendant had actual knowledge of the existence of a receiver or trustee in bankruptcy or that he wilfully closed his eyes to facts which made the existence of such an officer obvious. Rachmil v. United States, 9 Cir., 43 F. 2d 878, certiorari denied, 283 U.S. 819, 51 S.Ct. 344, 75 L.Ed. 1434. At the trial qf the present case the government produced no evidence that the defendant knew of the existence of the receiver or trustee in bankruptcy. The trial judge was not asked to instruct the jury that they might…
• Moore-McCORMACK Lines, Inc. v. Claire S. McMAHON under the will of Patrick McMahon, 235 F.2d 142 (2d Cir. 1956)
  …the desirability of one trial only. And we think our previous holdings, In re United States Steel Products Co., 2 Cir., 24 F. 2d 657, 659, and The Steel Inventor, 2 Cir., 43 F. 2d 958, 961, certiorari denied Bell v. United States Steel Products Co., 283 U.S. 819, 51 S.Ct. 344, 75 L.Ed. 1435, are direct authority for this course. The court below distinguished the cross-libels there against cargo claims in limitation of liability proceedings as being against the res, while the present claims were said to aris…