KILMER ET AL.
v.
NORFOLK & WESTERN RY. CO.

U.S. | 1931-03-02
No. 684
283 U.S. 824 Supreme Court of the United States (1931) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Golay (two cases), 155 F.2d 842 (10th Cir. 1946)
    …had it been given. Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Gaede, 10 Cir., 110 F. 2d 931; Stephenson v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Co., 7 Cir., 110 F. 2d 401, 132 A.L.R. 4'55; Kilmer v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co., 4 Cir., 45 F. 2d 532, certiorari denied 283 U.S. 824, 51 S.Ct. 347, 75 L.Ed. 1438; Bergman v. Northern Pacific Railway Co., 8 Cir., 14 F. 2d 580. But the value of negative testimony depends upon the surrounding circumstances and conditions. And where it appears that the witnesses giving the testimony…
  • Porto Venezia Condo. Ass'n v. WB Fort Lauderdale, LLC, 521 F. Supp. 2d 1185 (S.D. Fla. 2013)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw