KILMER ET AL.
v.
NORFOLK & WESTERN RY. CO.
KILMER ET AL.
NORFOLK & WESTERN RY. CO.
283 U.S. 824
Supreme Court of the United States (1931)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Golay (two cases), 155 F.2d 842 (10th Cir. 1946)…had it been given. Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Gaede, 10 Cir., 110 F. 2d 931; Stephenson v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Co., 7 Cir., 110 F. 2d 401, 132 A.L.R. 4'55; Kilmer v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co., 4 Cir., 45 F. 2d 532, certiorari denied 283 U.S. 824, 51 S.Ct. 347, 75 L.Ed. 1438; Bergman v. Northern Pacific Railway Co., 8 Cir., 14 F. 2d 580. But the value of negative testimony depends upon the surrounding circumstances and conditions. And where it appears that the witnesses giving the testimony…
-
Porto Venezia Condo. Ass'n v. WB Fort Lauderdale, LLC, 521 F. Supp. 2d 1185 (S.D. Fla. 2013)