PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD CO.

v.

SHINDLEDECKER

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Glasser, 443 F.2d 994 (2d Cir. 1971)
  …idence. See Carbo v. United States, 314 F. 2d 718, 742-43 (9th Cir. 1963), cert. denied sub nom. Palermo v. United States, 377 U.S. 953, 84 S.Ct. 1625, 12 L.Ed.2d 498 (1964); Gridley v. United States, 44 F. 2d 716, 740 (6th Cir. 1930), cert. denied, 283 U.S. 827, 51 S.Ct. 351, 75 L.Ed. 1441 (1931). Indeed, Glasser conceded at trial that this testimony was admissible under Carbo but contended merely that the court in the exercise of its discretion should exclude it. In view of the circumstantial evidence p…
• United States v. Frank Runnels (86-1923) & Arnold Shapero (86-1922), 833 F.2d 1183 (6th Cir. 1987)
  …r instance, the scheme need not have been actually successful in order for a mail fraud violation to have occurred. See, e.g., Erwin v. United States, 242 F. 2d 336 (6th Cir.1957); Gridley v. United States, 44 F. 2d 716 (6th Cir.1930), cert. denied, 283 U.S. 827, 51 S.Ct. 351, 75 L.Ed. 1441 (1931). Criminal liability for false pretenses, which the mail fraud statute was intended to reach, was consistently predicated upon the defendant’s taking or attempted taking of some economic benefit from the scheme’s v…