MAYTAG CO.

v.

MEADOWS MANUFACTURING CO.

Citator

Cited By

• BIG O Tire Dealers, Inc. v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 561 F.2d 1365 (10th Cir. 1977)
  …ic confu [*1375] sion resulting from a defendant’s wrongful conduct. E. g., Petersime & Son v. Robbins, 10 Cir., 81 F. 2d 295, cert. denied, 299 U.S. 553, 57 S.Ct. 15, 81 L.Ed. 407; Maytag Co. v. Meadows Mfg. Co., 7 Cir., 45 F. 2d 299, cert. denied, 283 U.S. 843, 51 S.Ct. 489, 75 L.Ed. 1452; Truzzolino Food Products Co. v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 108 Mont. 408, 91 P. 2d 415; Den Norske Ameriekalinje Actiesselskabet v. Sun Printing and Pub. Ass’n, 226 N.Y. 1,122 N.E. 463. Unlike the wronged parties in those cas…
• Switzer Bros., Inc. v. Locklin, 297 F.2d 39 (7th Cir. 1961)
  …es incurred by appellee in counteracting Switzer’s propaganda and threats to appellee’s customers were also properly found by the court as an element of appellee’s damages. Cf., Maytag Co. v. Meadows Mfg. Co., 7 Cir., 45 F. 2d 299, 302, cert. denied 283 U.S. 843, 51 S.Ct. 489, 75 L.Ed. 1452. We cannot say that the findings that appellee was damaged by appellants’ unlawful conduct are clearly erroneous. The elements of damage found are supported by the record and are elements [*48] authorized by law. The re…
• Nat'l Fam. Ins. Co. v. Exch. Nat'l Bank OF Chicago, 474 F.2d 237 (7th Cir. 1973)
  …Cir., 178 F. 2d 953, 954 (1950). See also Bradley v. Maryland Casualty Co., 8 Cir., 382 F. 2d 415, 420 (1967) (written by then-Circuit Judge Blackmun). Cf. Maytag Co. v. Meadows Manufacturing Co., 7 Cir., 45 F. 2d 299, 301-302 (1930), cert. denied, 283 U.S. 843, 51 S.Ct. 489, 75 L.Ed. 1452 (1931). Finding as we do that the limitations issue was correctly determined on its merits and that the procedural issue is without substance, the judgment of dismissal is affirmed. Affirmed.…