KING

v.

ALEXANDER, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE; AND RUZEK V. SAME

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Stanolind Crude Oil Purchasing Co., 113 F.2d 194 (10th Cir. 1940)
  …71 Okl. 204, 177 P. 86, 89, 3 A.L.R. 352. Rich v. Doneghey, supra, 177 P. page 89; Ohio Oil Company v. Indiana, 177 U.S. 190, 202-209, 20 S.Ct. 576, 44 L.Ed. 729; Alexander v. King, 10 Cir., 46 F. 2d 235, 238, 239, 74 A.L.R. 174, certiorari denied 283 U.S. 845, 51 S.Ct. 492, 75 L.Ed. 1455. In Rich v. Doneghey, supra, the court said [71 Okl. 204, 177 P. 89, 3 A.L.R. 352]: “But with respect to such oil and gas, they had certain rights designated by the same courts as a qualified ownership thereof, but whic…
• Vitter v. United States, 279 F.2d 445 (5th Cir. 1960)
  …as follows: “A) Regular Membership — Shall consist of persons of legal age, who are registered holders of at least one share of the capital stock of the Club.” . This is traced in Munn v. Bowers, 2 Cir., 1931, 47 F. 2d 204-205, certiorari denied, 283 U.S. 845, 51 S.Ct. 492, 75 L.Ed. 1454. . Typical of these the Taxpayer points to Lukens v. United States, 1926, 62 Ct.Cl. 598; Alliance Country Club v. United States, 1926, 62 Ct.Cl. 579; Page v. United States, 1926, 62 Ct.Cl. 590; Masonic Country Club v. H…
• Wild Wing Lodge v. Blacklidge, 59 F.2d 421 (7th Cir. 1932)
  …d,” it intended to cover such cases as this, where the acquirement of a member’s interest is “a condition precedent to membership.” In two similar cases this has been distinctly so held. Munn v. Bowers, 47 F.(2d) 204 (C. C. A. 2), certiorari deuied 283 U. S. 845, 51 S. Ct. 492, 75 L. Ed. 1454; Knoll-wood Club v. United States (Ct. Cl.) 48 F. (2d) 971. The contention of the unconstitutional ity of the act is sufficiently discussed and answered in tho Munn v. Bovvers Case, and we need present no further discu…