ART METAL CONSTRUCTION CO.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Ill. Citizens Comm. FOR Broad. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n & United States, 515 F.2d 397 (D.C. Cir. 1975)
  …ge a violation and not conclusively adjudicate a violation). The legislative history is similarly unclear. Originally, the FOO was given enforcement powers over obscene broadcasts. See Duncan v. United States, 48 F. 2d 128 (9th Cir.), cert denied, 283 U.S. 863, 51 S.Ct. 656, 75 L.Ed. 1468 (1931). In 1948, the prohibition on obscene . broadcasts was moved to Title 18 and nothing in Title 47 authorized the FCC to consider obscenity in a forfeiture proceeding. In 1960 Congress added § 503 to grant authorit…
• Parmelee v. United States, 113 F.2d 729 (D.C. Cir. 1940)
  …ure purposes (Dunlop v. United States, 165 U.S. 486, 17 S.Ct. 375, 41 L.Ed. 799); licentious and libidinous and tending to excite feelings of an impure or unchaste character (Duncan v. United States, 9 Cir., 48 F. 2d 128, 131-133, certiorari denied, 283 U.S. 863, 51 S.Ct. 656, 75 L.Ed. 1468); having relation to sexual impurity (Swearingen v. United States, 161 U.S. 446, 451, 16 S.Ct 562, 40 L.Ed. [*731] 765; Dysart v. United States, 272 U.S. 655, 657, 47 S.Ct. 234, 71 L.Ed. 461; Rosen v. United States, 161…
• Pacifica Found. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n & United States, 556 F.2d 9 (D.C. Cir. 1977)
  …se the issue. 515 F. 2d at 403 n. 13. The issue was not urged on this appeal. I merely note in passing that originally, the FCC was given enforcement powers over obscene broadcasts. See Duncan v. United States, 48 F. 2d 128 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 283 U.S. 863, 51 S.Ct. 656, 75 L.Ed. 1468 (1931). In 1948, the prohibition on obscene broadcasts was moved to Title 18 and nothing in Title 47 authorized the FCC to consider obscenity in a forfeiture proceeding. In 1960 Congress added § 503 to Title 47, Public L…