PHILIP J. MANDINA, APPELLANT,

v.

STANLEY S. DAVIDSON, RUTH S. DAVIDSON, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Broward Williams v. Ferrentino, 199 So. 2d 504 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967)
  …” Applying the rationale of Keating to the case sub judice, the Ferrentinos should have been accorded a hearing by the Commissioner before summarily having their privileged driving licenses taken away. See also In re Sackett’s Estate, Fla.App.1965, 171 So. 2d 906; Trumbull Chevrolet Sales Co., Inc. v. Motor Vehicle Commissioner, Fla.App.1961, 134 So. 2d 40. E—Judicial Review of Administrative Orders under F.S. Sec. 324.051, F.S.A. The Commissioner contends in his original brief that the “Order of Suspensio…
• Edelman v. Breed, 836 So. 2d 1092 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)
  …urt erred in failing to grant the appellant an opportunity to present its case-in-chief and, therefore, was denied the protection afforded by the constitutional guarantee of due process of law. Pelle, 287 So. 2d at 738. In In Re Estate of Sackett, 171 So. 2d 906 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965), an executor appealed an order vacating a final discharge order and appointing an administrator. The appellant argued that the trial court violated due process by entering the order without giving him an opportunity to present ev…
• Zimmerman v. Cade Enters., Inc., 34 So. 3d 199 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)
  …e based on the pleadings alone. It is well settled that facts admitted in a pleading are conclusively established on the record and require no further proof. See, e.g., Fernandez v. Fernandez, 648 So. 2d 712, 713 (Fla.1995); In re Sackett’s Estate, 171 So. 2d 906, 909 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965). That Cade Enterprises faced competing claims from both Mrs. Cade and Mr. Zimmerman for the dividends from the same shares is well established by the pleadings in this case. Accordingly, no evidentiary hearing was required a…

Authorities Cited

• Jacobs v. Jacobs, 50 So.2d 169 (Fla. 1951)
• McAllister v. McAllister, 140 Fla. 207 (Fla. 1939)