VIRGINIAN RY. CO.
v.
CHAMBERS; SAME V. FITZGERALD; AND SAME V. HYLTON
VIRGINIAN RY. CO.
CHAMBERS; SAME V. FITZGERALD; AND SAME V. HYLTON
284 U.S. 577
Supreme Court of the United States (1931)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
Judgments affirmed by a divided court.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wright v. Cent. Ky. Natural Gas Co., 297 U.S. 537 (U.S. 1936)…ginal franchise contract, the consumers were represented by the city. In re Engelhard & Sons Co., supra. Compare Smith v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co., 270 U. S. 587, 592; Kentucky v. Indiana, 281 U. S. 163, 174; Chicago v. Chicago Rapid Transit Co., 284 U. S. 577. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is Affirmed.…
-
Meyer v. Kan. City S. Ry. Co., 84 F.2d 411 (2d Cir. 1936)…ideration. See Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v. Watson, 287 U.S. 86, 91, 53 S.Ct. 32, 77 L.Ed. 180, 86 A.L.R. 174; Trustees System Co. of Pennsylvania v. Payne, 65 F.(2d) 103, 108 (C.C.A.3); Virginian Ry. Co. v. Chambers, 46 F.(2d) 20 (C.C.A.4), affirmed 284 U.S. 577, 52 S.Ct. 27, 76 L.Ed. 501. Judgment affirmed.…
-
MacKey v. City OF Little Rock, 94 F.2d 546 (8th Cir. 1938)…, 231 U.S. 646, 34 S.Ct. 258, 58 L.Ed. 416; Smith v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co., 270 U.S. 587, 592, 46 S.Ct. 408, 410, 70 L.Ed. 747; Kentucky v. Indiana, 281 U.S. 163, 173, 174, 50 S.Ct. 275, 277, 74 L.Ed. 784; Chicago v. Chicago Rapid Transit Co., 284 U.S. 577, 578, 52 S.Ct. 2, 76 L.Ed. 501; Wright v. Central Kentucky Natural Gas Co., 297 U.S. 537, 542, 56 S.Ct. 578, 579, 80 L.Ed. 850; Caldwell v. Guardian Trust Co., 8 Cir., 26 F. 2d 218, 222. This appeal in so far as it is from the order denying interve…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence