BROAD-GRACE ARCADE CORP.
v.
BRIGHT, MAYOR, ET AL.

U.S. | 1931-12-07
No. 72
284 U.S. 588 Supreme Court of the United States (1931) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The order denying an interlocutory injunction is affirmed (Alabama v. United States, 279 U. S. 229, 231; United Fuel Gas Co. v. Public Service Commission, 278 U. S. 322, 326; National Fire Insurance Co. v. Thompson, 281 U. S. 331, 338), but without prejudice to the power and duty of the District Court, as specially constituted, to inquire and determine whether the court has jurisdiction (Judicial Code, § 37; U. S. Code, Title 28, § 80) both in relation to the amount involved in the controversy (Chase v. Wetzler, 225 U. S. 79, 85, 86; North Pacific Steamship Co. v. Soley, 257 U. S. 216, 221), and with respect to the right of the complainant to maintain this suit in equity (Fenner v. Boykin, 271 U. S. 240, 243, 244; Cline v. Frink Dairy Co., 274 U. S. 445, 451-453).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • McNUTT v. Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp., 298 U.S. 178 (U.S. 1936)
    …; Deputron v. Young, 134 U. S. 241; Anderson v. Watt, 138 U. S. 694, 701; Wetmore v. Rymer, supra; Steigleder v. McQuesten, 198 U. S. 141, 143; Gilbert v. David, supra; North Pacific Steamship Co. v. Soley, supra; Broad-Grace Arcade Corp. v. Bright, 284 U. S. 588. In Anderson v. Watt, supra, a suit in equity, the Court said that under the Act of 1875 “the objection to the jurisdiction upon a denial of the averment of citizenship is not confined to a plea in abatement or a demurrer, but may be taken in the a…
  • Boynton v. Fox W. Coast Theatres Corp., 60 F.2d 851 (10th Cir. 1932)
    …lations of section 21 — 952, supra. Plaintiffs have wholly failed to' bring themselves within the principles announced in Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U. S. 356, 6 S. Ct. 1064, 30 L. Ed. 220. Broad-Grace Arcade Corp. v. Bright (D. C.) 48 F.(2d) 348; Id., 284 U. S. 588, 52 S. Ct. 137, 76 L. Ed. -; Ah Sin v. Wittman, 198 U. S. 500, 25 S. Ct. 756, 49 L. Ed. 1142. Finally, are plaintiffs entitled to equitable relief ? It is a general rule that a court of equity .will not interfere to- prevent the enforcement of a cr…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw