AVERILL, INSURANCE COMMISSIONER,
v.
NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL INS. CO.

U.S. | 1931-12-14
No. 165
284 U.S. 590 Supreme Court of the United States (1931) Negative Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The order granting an interlocutory injunction is affirmed (Alabama v. United States, 279 U. S. 229, 231) without prejudice to further consideration of the merits of the cause, and without prejudice to the power and duty of the District Court, as specially constituted, to inquire and determine whether the court has jurisdiction, both in relation to the amount involved in the controversy and with respect to the right of the complainant to' maintain this suit in equity.

Mr. I. H. Van Winkle, Attorney General of Oregon, with whom Mr. Willis S. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, was on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. Thomas MacMahon, with whom Mr. Guy E. Kelly was on the brief, for appellee.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Klass, 166 F.2d 373 (3d Cir. 1948)
    …ipal.” Cf. Regina v. Burton, 13 Cox C.C. 71 (1875); see. 1 Brill, Cyclopedia of Criminal Law (1922) 219. Dunn v. United States, 1932, 284 U.S. 390, 52 S.Ct. 189, 76 L.Ed. 356, 80 A.L.R. 161; (1932) 45 Harv.L.Rev. 931; Borum v. United States, 1932, 284 U.S. 590, 52 S.Ct. 205, 76 L.Ed. 513; see Commonwealth v. Wade, 1944, 156 Pa. Super. 88, 39 A. 2d 460; Commonwealth v. Kirk, 1940, 141 Pa.Super. 123, 147, 14 A. 2d 914, affirmed 1941, 340 Pa. 346. 17 A. 2d 195; Commonwealth v. Mowad, 1939, 136 Pa. Super. 537…
  • Vincenzo Anselmo v. Hardin, 253 F.2d 165 (3d Cir. 1958)
    …37 S.Ct. 68, 61 L.Ed. 161; United States v. De Angelo, 3 Cir., 1943, 138 F. 2d 466, 468. . See Note 4, supra. . 8 U.S.C. Sec. 214 (1940 od.) . Philippides v. Day, 1931, 283 U.S. 48, 51 S.Ct. 358, 75 L.Ed. 833; United States v. Vanbiervliet, 1931, 284 U.S. 590, 52 S.Ct. 132, 76 L.Ed. 509; see also United States v. Prince Line, 2 Cir., 1951, 189 F. 2d 386, 389; United States ex rel. Vounas v. Hughes, 3 Cir., 1940, 116 F. 2d 171, 174; United States ex rel. Fink v. Reimer, 2 Cir., 1938, 96 F. 2d 217. . 8 U.…
  • Takaji Mukai v. Burnett, 62 F.2d 355 (9th Cir. 1932)
    …1917 (8 USCA § 155), and the amendment contained in section 14 of the Immigration Act of 1924. This contention has been decided adversely to the appellant in Philippides v. Day, 283 U. S. 48, 51 S. Ct. 358, 75 L. Ed. 833, and U. S. v. Vanbiervliet, 284 U. S. 590, 52 S. Ct. 132, 76 L. Ed. —-. See, also, United States ex rel. Leo Stapf v. Corsi, 53 S. Ct. 40, 77 L. Ed. —-, decided by the Supreme Court November 7, 1932; Hendriksen v. Weedin, 61 F.(2d) 1030, decided by this court November 16, 1932. Order affi…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw