THOMSON ET AL.

v.

DANA ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Maison v. Confederated Tribes OF the Umatilla Indian Reservation, 314 F.2d 169 (9th Cir. 1963)
  …v. Washington, supra.], a restriction of the fishing activities of other citizens of a state is valid if merely reasonable, as required by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Thomson v. Dana, 52 F. 2d 759 (D.Ore.1931), aff’d. 285 U.S. 529, 52 S.Ct. 409, 76 L.Ed. 925 (1932). The complete exclusion of sports fishermen from the spawning grounds as an alternative does not amount to arbitrary discrimination against them, because the state possesses broader power to regulate sports fishing…
• San Francisco Shopping News Co. v. City of S. San Francisco, 69 F.2d 879 (9th Cir. 1934)
  …R. 1402; Stephenson v. Binford, 287 U. S. 251, 272, 53 S. Ct. 181, 77 L. Ed. 288, 87 A. L. R. 721; Starling v. Constantin, 287 U. S. 378, 398, 53 S. Ct. 190, 77 L. Ed. 375; Thomson v. Dana. (D. C. Or., three-judge case) 52 F.(2d) 759, 763, affirmed 285 U. S. 529, 52 S. Ct. 409, 79 L. Ed. 925. Repeatedly has the Supreme Court emphasized the advantageous position that the lawmaking power, as compared with the judiciary, occupies with reference to the knowledge of local conditions making a given enactment rea…

Authorities Cited

• Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co., 220 U.S. 61 (U.S. 1911)
• Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (U.S. 1927)
• Lawton v. Steele, 152 U.S. 133 (U.S. 1894)
• Heisler v. Thomas Colliery Co., 260 U.S. 245 (U.S. 1922)
• Manchester v. Massachusetts, 139 U.S. 240 (U.S. 1891)
• Crescent Cotton Oil Co. v. State of Miss., 257 U.S. 129 (U.S. 1921)
• Wampler v. Lecompte, 282 U.S. 172 (U.S. 1930)
• Miller v. McLaughlin, 281 U.S. 261 (U.S. 1930)