PAGE, TRUSTEE,
v.
ARKANSAS NATURAL GAS CORP.
PAGE, TRUSTEE,
ARKANSAS NATURAL GAS CORP.
285 U.S. 532
Supreme Court of the United States (1932)
Caution
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Kombst, 286 U.S. 424 (U.S. 1932)…rty Custodian brought this action in the Court of Claims to-recover the amount alleged to have been wrongfully exacted. The court sustained their contention, and allowed recovery of $23,563.03, with interest. 52 F. (2d) 1030. Certiorari was granted, 285 U. S. 532. The Government contends that the sum paid to California was not deductible; and that even if it should have been deducted, there can be no recovery, because the claim for refund was not made within the period allowed by law. The Revenue Act of 191…
-
In re Murray. Lilienstein v. Carberry, 92 F.2d 612 (7th Cir. 1937)…r section 60b, and section 23b [11 U.S.C.A. §§ 96(b), 46(b)] may not be waived by consent, as any other procedural privilege of the suitor may be waived, and a more summary procedure substituted.” See, also, Page v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corporation, 285 U.S. 532, 52 S.Ct. 407, 76 L.Ed. 927; Bryan v. Bernheimer, 181 U.S. 188, 21 S.Ct. 557, 45 L.Ed. 814; In re Rockford Produce Co. (C.C.A.) 275 F. 811; Schumacher v. Beeler, 293 U.S. 367, 55 S.Ct. 230, 79 L.Ed. 433; Central Republic B. & T. Co. v. Caldwell (C.C…
-
Cawman v. Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore Lines, 110 F.2d 832 (3d Cir. 1940)…ference is the basis of the District Court’s action and this appeal. The learned district judge below felt himself controlled by a case in the United States Supreme Court, Berry v. Baltimore & O. R. Co., Mo.Sup., 43 S.W. 2d 782, certiorari2 granted, 285 U.S. 532, 52 S.Ct. 407, 76 L.Ed. 927; Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. Berry, 286 U.S. 272, 52 S.Ct. 510, 76 L.Ed. 1098. Following that decision, he took the case from the jury and directed a verdict. Needless to say, it behooves us to carefully compare the case at…