SPEAKMAN, ANCILLARY RECEIVER,

v.

BRYAN, STATE RECEIVER

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. John, 437 U.S. 634 (U.S. 1978)
  …t of a larger group of Indians, long ago removed from Mississippi, nor the fact that federal supervision over them has not been continuous, destroys the federal power to deal with them. United States v. Wright, 53 F. 2d 300 (CA4 1931), cert. denied, 285 U. S. 539 (1932).24 The State also argues that the Federal Government may not deal specially with the Indians within the State’s boundaries because to do so would be inconsistent with the Treaty at Dancing Rabbit Creek. This argument may seem to be a cruel j…
• Alonso Menendez v. Saks & Co., 485 F.2d 1355 (2d Cir. 1973)
  …Insurance Co. v. Dick, 281 U.S. 397, 50 S.Ct. 338, 74 L.Ed. 926 (1930); Confederation Life Ass’n v. Ugalde, 151 So. 2d 315 (Fla.App.1963), rev’d in part, 164 So. 2d 1 (Fla.1964); Tillman v. Russo Asiatic Bank, 51 F. 2d 1023 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 285 U.S. 539, 52 S.Ct. 312, 76 L.Ed. 932 (1931); Holderness v. Hamilton, Fire Ins. Co. of New York, 54 F.Supp. 145 (S.D.Fla.1944). Here the agreement bound the importers to pay dollars, not pesos. It is not claimed that enforcement of that obligation constitute…
• The Agua Caliente Band OF Mission Indians v. The Cnty. OF Riverside, 442 F.2d 1184 (9th Cir. 1971)
  …County, S.D. v. United States, 26 F. 2d 434 (8 Cir. 1928), cert. den. 278 U.S. 649, 49 S.Ct. 94, 73 L.Ed. 561 (1928); United States v. Thurston County, 143 F. 287 (8 Cir. 1906); United States v. Wright, 53 F. 2d 300 (4 Cir. 1931), cert. [*1186] den. 285 U.S. 539, 52 S.Ct. 312, 76 L.Ed. 932; Morrow v. United States, 243 F. 854 (8 Cir. 1917). . Poafpybitty v. Skelly Oil Co., 390 U.S. 365, 88 S.Ct. 982, 19 L.Ed.2d 1238 (1968). . County of Riverside v. Palm-Ramon Development Co., 63 Cal.2d 534, 47 Cal.Rptr. 3…