JONES ET AL.

v.

BOX ELDER COUNTY ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31 (D.C. Cir. 1976)
• Cratty v. United States, 163 F.2d 844 (D.C. Cir. 1947)
  …was no request for an instruction and there was corroboration, through the witness Spitalnick, of the testimony of the informer Mullis. In Borum v. United States, 1932, 61 App.D.C. 4, 56 F. 2d 301, cert. denied sub nom. Logan v. United States, 1932, 285 U.S. 555, 52 S.Ct. 459, 76 L.Ed. 944, we expressed the view that a trial court should of its own motion caution the jury to weigh the testimony of an accomplice carefully and not to give it too much reliance. But we nevertheless held that in the absence of a…
• Tomlinson v. United States, 93 F.2d 652 (D.C. Cir. 1937)
  …, if it is so connected with the crime charged' as to establish a common scheme or purpose, so associated that proof of one tends to prove the other. Borum v. United States, 61 App.D.C. 4, 56 F. 2d 301, 303, certiorari denied Logan v. United States, 285 U.S. 555, 52 S.Ct. 459, 76 L.Ed. 944. In that case we said: “The ground on which such evidence is allowed is that both crimes are connected with a single purpose and in pursuance of a single object.” Smallwood’s testimony revealed a single purpose and the…