OSAKA SHOSEN KAISHA

v.

HABICHT BRAUN & CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Schaffer, 266 F.2d 435 (2d Cir. 1959)
  …certiorari denied, 350 U.S. 876, 76 S.Ct. 121, 100 L.Ed. 774; United States v. Leviton, 2 Cir., 1951, 193 F. 2d 848, certiorari denied, 343 U.S. 946, 72 S.Ct. 860, 96 L.Ed. 1350; Nash v. United States, 2 Cir., 1932, 54 F. 2d 1006, certiorari denied, 285 U.S. 556, 52 S.Ct. 457, 76 L.Ed. 945; Robinson v. United States, 1954, 93 U.S.App.D.C. 347, 210 F. 2d 29; Dunaway v. United States, 1953, 92 U.S.App.D.C. 299, 205 F. 2d 23. The case here is a far cry from the state of affairs disclosed in Kotteakos v. Unite…
• Sims v. United States, 405 F.2d 1381 (D.C. Cir. 1968)
  …in this case the 15 occasions on which the statements were admitted and which statements were admissible against which defendants. . And see Judge Learned Hand’s famous statement in Nash v. United States, 2 Cir., 54 F. 2d 1006, 1007, cert. denied, 285 U.S. 556, 52 S.Ct. 457, 76 L.Ed. 945 (1932), that a cautionary instruction is a “recommendation to the jury of a mental gymnastic which is beyond, not only their powers, but anybody’s else.” . A post-argument memorandum filed by the Government suggests a re…
• United States v. Daniels, 770 F.2d 1111 (D.C. Cir. 1985)
  …d mortal capacities. In such cases, it becomes particularly unrealistic to expect effective execution of the “mental gymnastic” required by limiting instructions, Nash v. United States, 54 F. 2d 1006, 1007 (2d Cir.) (Learned Hand, J.), cert. denied, 285 U.S. 556, 52 S.Ct. 457, 76 L.Ed. 945 (1932), and “the naive assumption that prejudicial effects can be overcome by instructions to jury” becomes more clearly than ever “unmitigated fiction,” Krulewitch v. United States, 336 U.S. 440, 453, 69 S.Ct. 716, 723,…