EX PARTE UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the World v. Lake Worth Inlet Dist. of Palm Beach Cnty., 119 Fla. 782 (Fla. 1935)
  …ebt prior in point of time. The statutes relating to Lake Worth Inlet District are wholly dissimilar to the successive Acts of the Legislature considered and dealt with in St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Franklin-American Trust Co., 52 Fed. (2nd) 431, 286 U. S. 533, 52 Sup. Ct. Rep. 642, 76 L. Ed. 1274. Unlike the Arkansas statutes considered in the case just cited, there has been no contractual engagement entered into by the Legislature, on the part of the Lake Worth Inlet District, to the effect that no sub…
• McALLISTER v. United States, 348 U.S. 19 (U.S. 1954)
  …Power Co. v. North Carolina Pub. Serv. Co., 263 U. S. 508; Keller v. Adams-Campbell Co., 264 U. S. 314; Wisconsin Electric Co. v. Dumore Co., 282 U. S. 813; Sanchez v. Borras, 283 U. S. 798; Franklin-American Trust Co. v. St. Louis Union Trust Co., 286 U. S. 533; Moor v. Texas & N. O. R. Co., 297 U. S. 101; Texas & New Orleans R. Co. v. Neill, 302 U. S. 645; Goodman v. United States, 305 U. S. 578; Goins v. United States, 306 U. S. 622; McCullough v. Kammerer Corp., 323 U. S. 327; McCarthy v. Bruner, 323 U.…
• Ex parte Republic of Peru, 318 U.S. 578 (U.S. 1943)
  …circumstances declined to issue the writ to a district court, but without prejudice to an application to the circuit court of appeals (Ex parte Apex Mfg. Co., 274 U. S. 725; Ex parte Daugherty, 282 U. S. 809; Ex parte Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Co., 286 U. S. 533), which likewise has power under § 262 of the Judicial Code to issue the writ. McClellan v. Carland, 217 U. S. 268; Adams v. U. S. ex rel. McCann, 317 U. S. 269. After a full review of the traditional use of the common-law writs by this Court, and…