BALDWIN ET AL.
v.
AMERICAN SURETY CO.
BALDWIN ET AL.
AMERICAN SURETY CO.
286 U.S. 537
Supreme Court of the United States (1932)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Am. Sur. Co. v. Baldwin, 287 U.S. 156 (U.S. 1932)…e on certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which reversed the decree of the federal court for Idaho denying the Surety Company’s application to enjoin the enforcement of the judgment and dismissing the bill. 286 U. S. 537. In each case it is claimed that the judgment is void under the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The bond was given upon the appeal of the Singer Sewing Machine Company and Anderson, its employee, to the Supreme Court of Idaho from a…
-
Nat'l Sur. Co. v. Coriell, 289 U.S. 426 (U.S. 1933)…eretofore [*433] transferred to it. ...” 1 On February 23, 1932, the dissenting creditors-pétitioned for a writ of certiorari to reT view the decree of the Circuit Court of Appeals entered November 23, 1931; and the writ was granted on May 12, 1932. 286 U.S. 537. [*434] The petitioners contend that the District Court had no power to deprive the dissenting creditors of a cash share in the assets; that the amount of this share should have been determined by a public sale; that the right of dissenting creditor…