ENRIGHT ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Alton v. Alton, 207 F.2d 667 (3d Cir. 1953)
  …v. Territory of Hawaii, 9 Cir., 1942, 130 F. 2d 786, 789; Brodhead v. Borthwick, 9 Cir., 1949, 174 F. 2d 21, certiorari denied, 1949, 338 U.S. 847, 70 S.Ct. 87, 94 L.Ed. 518; Kitagawa v. Shipman, 9 Cir., 1931, 54 F. 2d 313, certiorari denied, 1932, 286 U.S. 543, 52 S.Ct. 496, 76 L.Ed. 1281; Lastra v. New York & Porto Rico S.S. Co., 1 Cir., 1924, 2 F. 2d 812, appeal dismissed, 1925, 269 U.S. 536, 46 S.Ct. 106, 70 L.Ed. 400; Gonzalez v. People of Porto Rico, 1 Cir., 1931, 51 F. 2d 61; People of Puerto Rico v…
• Kraemer Mills v. The United States, 319 F.2d 535 (Ct. Cl. 1963)
  …st be terminated by some clear-cut agreement of a formal nature in order to give rise to a cause of action in the plaintiff. The case before us is similar in that respect to Enright v. United States, 54 F. 2d 182, 73 Ct.Cl. 416 (1931), cert. denied, 286 U.S. 543, 52 S.Ct. 495, 76 L.Ed. 1280 (1932). The plaintiff therein sought to avoid the bar of limitations on the ground that the Government’s written notice of termination was insufficient to start the statute running because it did not use explicit languag…