FIRST UNION TRUST & SAVINGS BANK, TRUSTEE,

v.

CONSUMERS CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Fay Heasley, 283 F.2d 422 (8th Cir. 1960)
  …al court and this discretion will not be disturbed on appeal except in cases of its abuse. See Bovay v. Townsend, 8 Cir., 78 F. 2d 343, 345, 105 A.L.R. 359; Speers Sand & Clay Works v. American Trust Co., 4 Cir., 52 F. 2d 831, 835, certiorari denied 286 U.S. 548, 52 S.Ct. 500, 76 L.Ed. 1284; Revere Copper & Brass v. Adriance Machine Works, 2 Cir., 68 [*427] F. 2d 708, 709.5 6 This record convincingly and conclusively demonstrates that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in directing the sale of the…
• Am. Trading & Prod. Corp. v. Connor, 109 F.2d 871 (4th Cir. 1940)
  …more than double the price should be rejected. The most recent statement by this court of the rule generally applicable under such circumstances is found in Speers Sand & Clay Works v. American Trust Co., 4 Cir., 52 F. 2d 831, 835, certiorari denied 286 U.S. 548, 52 S.Ct. 500, 76 L.Ed. 1284, as follows: “The rule is well settled that ‘a judicial sale regularly made in the manner prescribed by law, upon due notice, and without fraud, unfairness, surprise or mistake, will not generally be set aside or refused…
• Regents of Univ. Sys. of Ga. v. Page, 81 F.2d 577 (5th Cir. 1936)
  …78 L.Ed. 859; Shannopin Country Club v. Heiner (D.C.) 2 F.(2d) 393; Lafayette Worsted Co. v. Page (D.C.) 6 F.(2d) 399, 400; Bunker Hill Country Club v. United States (Ct.Cl.) 9 F.Supp. 52; Wourdack v. Becker (C.C.A.) 55 F.(2d) 840, certiorari denied 286 U.S. 548, 52 S.Ct. 501, 76 L.Ed. 1285. The admission tax statute (44 Stat. 91, § 500, as amended) provides that the tax is “to be paid by the person paying for such admission.” It further provides (44 Stat. 9, § 2) that “the term ‘taxpayer’ means any person…