JOHN C. WINSTON CO.
v.
TRIMBLE ET AL.
JOHN C. WINSTON CO.
TRIMBLE ET AL.
286 U.S. 555
Supreme Court of the United States (1932)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Rayburn, 91 F.2d 162 (8th Cir. 1937)…e 1696(3), for the two years involved here. The judgment is reversed with instructions to grant a new trial. Two instructive cases are In re Hurley Mercantile Co., 56 F.(2d) 1023 (C.C.A. 5), certiorari denied Atascosa County State Bank v. Coppard, 286 U.S. 555, 52 S.Ct. 580, 76 L.Ed. 1290, and The Washington, 16 F.(2d) 206 (C.C.A.2). Our examination has been confined to the precise issue presented. That there is a difference between the rendition of a judgment and the entry thereof; that for some purpose…
-
Bohdan Maksymchuk v. Frank, 987 F.2d 1072 (4th Cir. 1993)…e parties. In fact, the "now” {nunc) was December 3, 1991, when entry of the order first occurred; the "then" {tunc) was April 24, 1989, the date of the order itself. See In re Hurley Mercantile Co., 56 F. 2d 1023, 1025 (5th Cir.1932), cert. denied, 286 U.S. 555, 52 S.Ct. 580, 76 L.Ed. 1290 (1932); 4A C.J.S. Appeal and Error § 445, at 114 (1957) ("While the date of the judgment, order, or decree, as shown by the record, governs until corrected by proper proceeding, the commencement of the period cannot be m…