COLONIAL TRUST CO., EXECUTOR,
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1932-05-31
No. 871
286 U.S. 560 Supreme Court of the United States (1932) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …an extension of time in which to file a petition for certiorari. This application was denied on January 17, 1950, on the authority of Finn v. Railroad Commission, 286 U.S. 559, 52 S.Ct. 646, 76 L.Ed. 1293; Cresswell ex rel. Di Pierro v. Tillinghast, 286 U.S. 560, 52 S.Ct. 648, 76 L.Ed. 1293, and Robinson and Kirkham, “Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of the United States,” Section 386 (1936). On March 7, 1950, a petition for writ of habeas corpus was filed in the court below and amended three days later.…
  • …e warrant. Raftery ex rel. Giacomazzi v. Tillinghast, 1 Cir., 63 F. 2d 97; United States ex rel. Danikas v. Day, 2 Cir., 20 F. 2d 733. See Tillinghast v. Cresswell ex rel. Di Pierro, 1 Cir., 54 F. 2d 459, 460, certiorari denied on technical grounds, 286 U.S. 560, 52 S.Ct. 648, 76 L.Ed. 1293; United States ex rel. Trinler v. Carusi, 3 Cir., 166 F. 2d 457, 459 n. 5. See also Oarusi, “The Federal Administrative Procedure Act and The Immigration and Naturalization Service,” in Warren, Federal Administrative Pro…
  • Kirkpatrick v. Hardt, 303 U.S. 626 (U.S. 1938)
    …ers herein submitted, finds that the application for writ of certiorari was not made within the time provided by law. Act of February 13, 1925, sec. 8 (a) (43 Stat. 936, 940). Finn v. Railroad Commission, 286 U. S. 559; Cresswell &c. v. Tillinghast, 286 U. S. 560. The petition for writ of certiorari is therefore also denied.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw