BIGGS, ADMINISTRATRIX
v.
MISSOURI PACIFIC R. CO. ET AL.; AND GRAVES V. SAME

U.S. | 1932-11-21
Nos. 414; No. 415
287 U.S. 575 Supreme Court of the United States (1932) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The appeals herein are dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Section 238, Judicial Code as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 938), U. S. Code, Title 28, § 345; § 13, Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 941).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167 (U.S. 1961)
    …Blackman v. Stone, 101 F. 2d 500 (C. A. 7th Cir. 1939); City of Manchester v. Leiby, 117 F. 2d 661 (C. A. 1st Cir. 1941); Hannan v. City of Haverhill, 120 F. 2d 87 (C. A. 1st Cir. 1941); Hume v. Mahan, 1 F. Supp. 142 (D. C. E. D. Ky. 1932), rev’d, 287 U. S. 575; Premier-Pabst Sales Co. v. McNutt, 17 F. Supp. 708 (D. C. S. D. Ind. 1935) ; Gobitis v. Minersville School Dist., 21 F. Supp. 581 (D. C. E. D. Pa. 1937), 24 F. Supp. 271 (1938), aff’d, 108 F. 2d 683 (C. A. 3d Cir. 1939), rev’d, 310 U. S. 586; C…
  • Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (U.S. 1962)
    …Court. Wood v. Broom, 287 U. S. 1, reversing 1 F. Supp. 134. A similar decree of a District Court, exercising jurisdiction under the same statute, concerning a Kentucky redistricting act, was [*202] reviewed and the decree reversed. Mahan v. Hume, 287 U. S. 575, reversing 1 F. Supp. 142.20 The appellees refer to Colegrove v. Green, 328 U. S. 549, as authority that the District Court lacked jurisdietion of the subject matter. Appellees misconceive the holding of that case. The holding was precisely contrar…
  • United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36 (U.S. 1950)
    …. 216; Alejandrino v. Quezon, 271 U. S. 528; Norwegian Nitrogen Co. v. Tariff Commission, 274 U. S. 106; United States v. Anchor Coal Co., 279 U. S. 812; Sprunt & Son v. United States, 281 U. S. 249; Hargis v. Bradford, 283 U. S. 781; Mahan v. Hume, 287 U. S. 575; Railroad Commission of Texas v. Macmillan, 287 U. S. 576; Coyne v. Prouty, 289 U. S. 704; First Union Trust & Savings Bank v. Consumers Co., 290 U. S. 585; Danciger Oil & Refining Co. v. Smith, 290 U. S. 599; O’Ryan v. Mills Novelty Co., 292 U. S.…

Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw