GREAT NORTHERN RY. CO.

v.

SUNBURST OIL & REFINING CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Texas v. Florida, 306 U.S. 398 (U.S. 1939)
  …rd substantial basis for the claim that he was domiciled within it, with fair probability that the claim would be accepted and favorably acted upon if there were no participation by the other states in the litigation. See New Jersey v. Pennsylvania, 287 U. S. 580; Hill v. Martin, 296 U. S. 393; Dorrance’s Estate, 309 Pa. 151; 163 A. 303, certiorari denied, 287 U. S. 660, 288 U. S. 617; In re Dorrance, 115 N. J. Eq. 268; 170 A. 601; Dorrance v. Martin, 116 N. J. Law 362; 184 A. 743, certiorari denied, 298 U.…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Worcester Cnty. Tr. Co. v. Riley, 302 U.S. 292 (U.S. 1937)
  …a judicial determination in each that decedent was last domiciled there, cf. Dorrance’s Estate, 309 Pa. 151; 163 Atl. 303; In re Estate of Dorrance, 115 N. J. Eq. 268; 170 Atl. 601; 116 N. J. Eq. 204; 172 Atl. 503, with New Jersey v. Pennsylvania, 287 U. S. 580; Dorrance v. Pennsylvania, 287 U. S. 660; Hill v. Martin, 296 U. S. 393, although he could not be domiciled in both; that neither state could constitutionally authorize its officials to impose the tax if decedent was last domiciled elsewhere, and pe…
• State Tax Comm'n of Utah v. Aldrich, 316 U.S. 174 (U.S. 1942)
  …ourts make inconsistent findings on domicile resulting in estate taxation by two or more States. Massachusetts v. Missouri, 308 U. S. 1; Texas v. Florida, 306 U. S. 398; Worcester County Trust Co. v. Riley, 302 U. S. 292; New Jersey v. Pennsylvania, 287 U. S. 580; Dorrance v. Pennsylvania, 287 U. S. 660 and 288 U. S. 617, certiorari denied to review Dorrance’s Estate, 309 Pa. 151; Hill v. Martin, 296 U. S. 393; Dorrance v. Martin, 298 U. S. 678, certiorari denied to review Dorrance v. Thayer-Martin, 116 N. J…