ROCCO, EXECUTRIX,

v.

LEHIGH VALLEY R. CO.

Citator

Cited By

• McDonnell v. United States, 288 U.S. 420 (U.S. 1933)
  …59 F. (2d) 290. Because of conflict of the decision with that in Uncasville Manufacturing Co. v. Commissioner, 55 F. (2d) 893, certiorari was granted, limited to the question of the, validity of the waiver under § 278 (e) of the Revenue Act of 1924. 287 U. S. 589. The waiver was given under the following circumstances. McDonnell was in 1917 a member of the .firm of McDonnell & Trudá, which in that year filed its income tax return and paid the taxes therein shown to be due. On March 18, 1923, that is, within…
• ST. Louis Sw. Ry. Co. v. Mo. Pac. R.R. Co., 289 U.S. 76 (U.S. 1933)
  …paragraph 22 [*80] of § 1 of the Interstate Commércé Act,2 and so not subject to the requirement of a certificate from the federal Commission. 185 Ark. 824; 49 S.W. (2d) 1054. Because of the decision of that federal question- certiorari was granted. 287 U.S. 589. The St. Louis Southwestern asks us to reverse the judgment on the ground that upon the evidence introduced before the Arkansas Commission the proposed track should be held to be an extension of the Missouri Pacific’s line into new territory, withi…