SCRANTON ELECTRIC CO.

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

Citator

Cited By

• Cent. Transfer Co. v. Terminal R.R. Ass'n of ST. Louis, 288 U.S. 469 (U.S. 1933)
  …on a suit to enjoin them was unauthorized under § 16 of .the Clayton Act> 38 Stat. 737, 15 U. S. C. A., § 26, unless brought by the United States. The Court of Appeals for the Eighth. Circuit affirmed. 61 F. (2d) 546. This Court granted certiorari. 287 U. S. 595. For many years before the present suit, the respondent rail carriers had maintained in'St. Louis and East St. Louis certain "off track” stations for receipt arid delivery of less-than-carload freight and by the employment of transfer companies, in…
• Pac. Coast Steel Co. v. McLAUGHLIN, 288 U.S. 426 (U.S. 1933)
  …iver was valid under § 278 of the Revenue Act of 1924. The judgment of the District Court was accordingly affirmed. 61 F. (2d) 73. This Court granted certiorari, “ limited to the question of the effect of section 278 (e) of the Revenue Act of 1924.” 287 U. S. 595. [*428] The petitioner contends that clause (2) of paragraph (e) of § 278, which states that the section shall not “ affects any assessment made, or distraint or proceeding in court begun, before the enactment of this Act,” renders paragraph (c) ino…