ARTHUR C. HARVEY CO.

v.

MALLEY ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Bd. of Trs. of the Univ. of Ill. v. United States, 289 U.S. 48 (U.S. 1933)
  …free. At the hearing on the protest, the Customs Court, decided, in favor of the Government (59 Treas. Dec. 747) and the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals affirmed the decision. 61 Treas. Dec. 1334. This Court granted certiorari. 28 U.S.C. § 308; 287 U.S. 596. The Tariff Act of 1922 is entitled — 'An Act to provide revenue, to regulate commerce with foreign countries', to encourage the industries of the United States, and for other purposes.” The Congress thus asserted that it was exercising its constit…
• Porto RICO Brokerage Co., Inc. v. United States, 76 F.2d 605 (C.C.P.A. 1935)
  …g in from a place outside our customs limits. Procter & Gamble Co. v. United States, supra. Goods are not imported until the duties are levied and paid. Board of Trustees, etc., v. United States, 20 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 134, T. D. 45773, affirmed m 287 U. S. 596, 53 S. Ct. 315, 77 L. Ed. 520. “Import” means to bring an article into a country from the outside. Cunard S. S. Co. v. Mellon, 262 U. S. 100, 122, 43 S. Ct. 504, 67 L. Ed. 894, 27 A. L. R. 1306. A statement very relevant to the issues here involved…