BALTIMORE & OHIO R. CO. ET AL.

v.

BAKER, U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Citator

Cited By

• Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. v. Brady, 288 U.S. 448 (U.S. 1933)
  …n. Reversed. The district court found the proposed bill was presented out of time and refused to sign it. 56 F. (2d) 231. The Circuit Court of Appeals denied mandamus. 58 F. (2d) 627. This Court denied certiorari, Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. Baker, 287 U. S. 610. “The acts and practices of defendants whereby they accorded Maryland service to the mines of the West Virginia Coal & Coke Company located on the Coalton branch of the B. & O. Railroad Company during the period' from October 14, 1922, to April 1,…
• Harris v. United States, 70 F.2d 897 (4th Cir. 1934)
  …ly well settled that this court is without power to! consider bills of exceptions unless they are signed by the trial judge. Osborn v. United States (C. C. A.) 50 F.(2d) 712; Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. Baker (C. C. A.) 58 F.(2d) 627; certiorari denied 287 U. S. 610, 53 S. Ct. 13, 77 L. Ed. 530. Where there is no bill of exceptions properly'before the court, the record which we may consider on appeal is limited to the pleadings, process, verdict, and judgment. See Reilly v. Beekman (C. C. A.) 24 F.(2d) 791; Bar…
• Searl v. Earll, 221 F.2d 24 (D.C. Cir. 1954)
  …permitting its recovery, if paid, by action begun within one year after payment.” Richards v. Bippus, 1901, 18 App.D.C. 293, 304. See also Quinn v. National Mortgage & Investment Co., 1932, 61 App.D.C. 44, 47, 57 F. 2d 410, certiorari denied, 1932, 287 U.S. 610, 53 S.Ct. 13, 77 L.Ed. 530; and Cockrell v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n, D.C.Mun.App., 1943, 33 A. 2d 621, 623. Thus, applying these principles to the facts as found by the Municipal Court, note 5, supra, and more fully recited in its opinio…