RALPH JUNIOR GURGANIOUS, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• McGARRY v. McGARRY, 247 So. 2d 13 (Fla. 2d DCA 1971)
  …should not be disturbed unless they represent an abuse of discretion or are patently erroneous on the record; and an appellant carries the responsibility in an appellate court of clearly demonstrating such error.” See Olsen v. Olsen, Fla.App.1965, 172 So. 2d 276; Burnett v. Burnett, Fla.App.1967, 197 So. 2d 854. As to the termination of the alimony payments, it is settled law in this State that the Chancellor may consider the divorced wife’s ability to be employed and earn a living as a relevant material f…
• Harris v. Harris, 260 So. 2d 854 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972)
  …ent appealed is accordingly affirmed. SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON, and JOHNSON, JJ., concur. . 5 Fla. Jur. 252, Cancellation, Reformation, and Rescission of Instruments, § 54. . 33 Fla. Jur. 124, Trusts, § 124. . Olsen v. Olsen (Fla.App.1965), 172 So. 2d 276.…
• Kowel v. Kowel, 240 So. 2d 508 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970)
  …f equity to enforce the payment of support arrearages is a matter within the sound judicial of discretion of the trial judge. Rogoff v. Rogoff, Fla.App.1959, 115 So. 2d 456; Boyle v. Boyle, Fla.App.1964, 164 So. 2d 566; Olsen v. Olsen, Fla.App.1965, 172 So. 2d 276, 277; Levison v. Levison, Fla.App.1967, 193 So. 2d 630. The circumstances of this case do not show a clear abuse of discretion. The order is affirmed as to this holding. Appellant’s remaining points claim error upon that portion of the order which…

Authorities Cited

• Grady Allen Belger v. State, 171 So. 2d 574 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965)
• Thomas v. State, 59 So.2d 517 (Fla. 1952)