RORICK ET AL.

v.

CENTRAL FARMERS TRUST CO., TRUSTEE

Citator

Cited By

• Hartford-Empire Co. v. Obearnester Glass Co., 95 F.2d 414 (8th Cir. 1938)
  …1, 43 S.Ct. 106, 115, 67 L.Ed. 244; and for other judicial expressions and applications see Selden Co. v. General Chemical Co., 3 Cir., 73 F. 2d 195, 196; Continental Oil Co. v. Osage Oil & Refining Co., 10 Cir., 57 F. 2d 527, 529, certiorari denied 287 U.S. 616, 53 S.Ct. 17, 77 L.Ed. 535; General Electric Co. v. Alexander, 2 Cir., 280 F. 852, 855; Rosemary Mfg. Co. v. Halifax Cotton Mills, 4 Cir., 266 F. 363; Berliner Gramaphone Co. v. Seaman, 4 Cir., 113 F. 750, 754; Sheffield & B., etc., Co. v. Newman, 5…
• Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. Andrus, 687 F.2d 1324 (10th Cir. 1982)
  …are being asserted. Morrison Oil and Gas Co. v. Burger, 423 F. 2d 1178, 1182-83 (5th Cir.); Twyford v. Whitchurch, 132 F. 2d 819, 821 and n.6 (10th Cir.); Continental Oil Co. v. Osage Oil & Refining Co., 69 F. 2d 19, 23-24 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 287 U.S. 616, 53 S.Ct. 17, 77 L.Ed. 535; 2 E. Kuntz, Oil and Gas 324-26 (1964). While there was some mention of the element of wrongfulness in Continental Oil, the case relied on by the district court, the case is not premised on “wrongful” conduct. It is true…
• Cont'l OIL Co. v. Osage OIL & Ref. Co., 69 F.2d 19 (10th Cir. 1934)
  …v. Osage Oil & Refining Company (C. C. A. 8) 29 F.(2d) 712; Osage Oil & Refining Company v. Continental Oil Company (C. C. A. 10) 34 F.(2d) 585; Continental Oil Company v. Osage Oil & Refining Company (C. C. A. 10) 57 F.(2d) 527, certiorari denied, 287 U. S. 616, 53 S. Ct. 17, 77 L. Ed. 535; Wilbur v. United States, 60 App. D. C. 326, 54 F.(2d) 437. I cannot agree to a reversal for this reason : The only possible justification for permitting a second supplemental petition to he filed is because material fa…

  ← 1 / 2 →