CLIFT & GOODRICH, INC.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Ranson, 121 So. 2d 175 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960)
  …e terms of the policy are clear and concise. Houran v. Preferred Accident Ins. Co. of New York, 109 Vt. 258, 195 A. 253. An illustrative case on this distinction is Southern Surety Co. v. MacMillan Co., 10 Cir., 1932, 58 F. 2d 541, certiorari denied 287 U.S. 617, 53 S.Ct. 18, 77 L.Ed. 536, wherein the Court held that if the giving of notice is a condition precedent, the failure to give it according to the terms of the policy relieves the insurer from liability, but that in the case before the court the lang…
• Friedman v. Decatur Corp., 135 F.2d 812 (D.C. Cir. 1943)
  …ore unilateral contracts by actual performance on the part of the offeree.” City of New Orleans v. Texas & P. R. Co., 171 U.S. 312, 334, 18 S.Ct. 875, 43 L.Ed. 178; Southern Surety Co. v. MacMillan Co., 10 Cir., 58 F. 2d 541, 547, certiorari denied 287 U.S. 617, 53 S.Ct. 18, 77 L.Ed. 536: 3 Williston, Contracts, (Rev. Ed. 1936), § 666A. 3 Williston, Contracts (Rev. Ed. 1936) § 666; Hurt v. New York Life Ins. Co., 10 Cir., 51 F. 2d 936, 938-939. 3 Williston, Contracts (Rev. Ed. 1936) §§ 678, 679, 689, 690;…
• Sec. Mut. Cas. Co. v. Century Cas. Co., 531 F.2d 974 (10th Cir. 1976)
  …ontract. A court will not force an ambiguity in order to resolve it against an insurer. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. DeSalvo, 482 P. 2d 380 (Colo.1971); Southern Surety Co. v. MacMillan Co., 58 F. 2d 541 (10th Cir. 1932), cert. denied, 287 U.S. 617, 53 S.Ct. 18, 77 L.Ed. 536. The notice provision of the Security Mutual-Century Casualty reinsurance treaty states: The Company [Century] shall immediately give notice to the Reinsurer [Security] on all claims reserved in excess of the Company’ [si…