U. S. FIDELITY & GUARANTY CO.

v.

BASSINGER

Citator

Cited By

• RAY v. United States, 114 F.2d 508 (8th Cir. 1940)
  …ered in the negative. It is the duty of the defendant to take exceptions to the charge of the court or to request additional instructions before the jury retires to consider the case. Jenkins v. United States, 4 Cir., 58 F. 2d 556, certiorari denied 287 U.S. 622, 53 S.Ct. 21, 77 L.Ed. 540; Booth v. United States, 10 Cir., 57 F. 2d 192; Elderd v. United States, 4 Cir., 44 F. 2d 170. Where prejudicial error is obvious in a criminal case, appellate courts should of their own motion' recognize it and give prote…
• Miami Structural Iron Corp. v. CIE Nationale Belge DE T.M., 224 F.2d 566 (5th Cir. 1955)
  …Packing Co. v. Cosmopolitan Shipping Co., D.C.N.D.E.D.Ill.1925, 14 F. 2d 971; Gerli & Co. v. Canard S.S. Co., 2 Cir., 1931, 48 F. 2d 115; United States Industrial Alcohol Co. v. Calmar S.S. Corporation, 2 Cir., 1932, 57 F. 2d 182, certiorari denied 287 U.S. 622, 53 S.Ct. 21, 77 L.Ed. 540.…
• Douglass v. Thurston Cnty., 86 F.2d 899 (9th Cir. 1936)
  …ederal courts, by the statutes and decisions of the state requiring the bond. Both the rule and the pressing reason therefor were lucidly expounded in Bassinger v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (C.C.A.8) 58 F.(2d) 573, 574, certiorari denied 287 U.S. 622, 53 S. Ct. 21, 77 L.Ed. 540: “This bond is a Nebraska contract made in connection with a state officer of the state of Nebraska. It would be very unfortunate if the liability upon bonds required by the statutes of a state and covering its officers…