TWIN FALLS CANAL CO.
v.
AMERICAN FALLS RESERVOIR DISTRICT NO. 2
TWIN FALLS CANAL CO.
AMERICAN FALLS RESERVOIR DISTRICT NO. 2
287 U.S. 638
Supreme Court of the United States (1932)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Burley Irr. Dist. v. Ickes, 116 F.2d 529 (D.C. Cir. 1940)…eration shall remain in the Government until otherwise provided by Congress.” 32 Stat. 389, 43 U.S.C. .§ 498, 43 U.S.C.A. § 498. Cf. Twin Falls Canal Co. v. American Falls Reservoir District No. 2, 9 Cir., 1932, 59 F. 2d 19, certiorari denied, 1932, 287 U.S. 638, 53 S.Ct. 87, 77 L.Ed. 552; United States v. Power County, Idaho, D.C.Idaho, 1937, 21 F.Supp. 684, 687. “Whenever any legally organized water-users’ association or irrigation district shall so request, the Secretary of the Interior is authorized, i…
-
Nicolson v. Brown, 135 F.2d 245 (D.C. Cir. 1943)….E. 408. Schuylkill Navigation Co. v. Commissioners, 11 Pa. 202, 204; United States v. Big Horn Land & Cattle Co., 8 Cir., 17 F. 2d 357, 365. Twin Falls Canal Co. v. American Falls Reservoir, Dist. No. 2, 9 Cir., 59 F. 2d 19, 23, certiorari denied 287 U.S. 638, 53 S.Ct. 87, 77 L.Ed. 552; Johnson Irrigation Co. v. Ivory, 46 Wyo. 221, 24 P. 2d 1053, 1056. Freid v. McGrath, 76 U.S.App.D.C. 388, 133 F. 2d 350.…